Strengthening Sri Lanka's Food Fortification through Supply Chains



Simply put, food fortification means infusing everyday staples with essential vitamins and minerals, ensuring consumers get the nutrients they need. Yet, the process and accountability are not so simple, and the process should be done with extended research and responsibility. Food fortification can be classified into mass fortification, targeted fortification and market-driven fortification.

At present, Sri Lanka is addressing micronutrient deficiencies through comprehensive food fortification initiatives, focusing on staple foods such as wheat flour and rice. While significant progress has been made, challenges persist. Enhancing the responsiveness of Sri Lanka's food fortification supply chain necessitates a multifaceted approach that addresses infrastructural deficiencies, regulatory frameworks, technological advancements, and stakeholder collaboration. Sri Lanka places itself as a moderately hungry nation in the Global Hunger Index of 2024. Let's look at some key areas that need attention, referring to the lessons learnt from global initiatives.

Enhancing the responsiveness of Sri Lanka's food fortification supply chain is crucial for improving national nutrition and food security. Key strategies could include:

1. Strengthening infrastructure and logistics by enhancing transportation networks, developing adequate storage facilities, and maintaining the quality and shelf-life of fortified products.

2. Enhancing regulatory frameworks and Quality Control through regular inspections and quality assessments by relevant authorities. A well-defined framework delineating the duties of government agencies, producers, and distributors is essential. Clear guidelines facilitate accountability and streamline operations within the supply chain. also, equipping regulatory bodies and food producers with the necessary tools and knowledge enhances their capacity to maintain quality standards. This includes training on best practices in fortification processes and quality assurance.

3. Leveraging technological innovations and implementing digital platforms for tracking and managing inventory can reduce wastage, optimize stock levels, and ensure a steady supply of fortified foods. Real-time data aids in making informed decisions and anticipating demand fluctuations. In addition, developing the capacity to produce vitamin and mineral premixes domestically can reduce dependency on imports, lower costs, and ensure a more reliable supply chain.

4. Strengthening Public-Private Partnerships can lead to shared resources, expertise, and infrastructure, thereby improving supply chain efficiency. Grassroots organizations could play a crucial role in educating the public and industries about the benefits of fortified foods and can aid in monitoring distribution at the local level. This involvement ensures that fortification programs are culturally sensitive and community driven.

5. Climate-induced events such as droughts and floods disrupt agricultural productivity, affecting the availability of staples for fortification. Implementing climate-resilient agricultural practices and developing contingency plans are essential to maintain a stable supply chain. It is commendable to mobilize the resources and to ensure sustainability.

6. Introducing digital food quality traceability tools (such as DFQT+) to enhance regulatory oversight and supply chain transparency from farm to fork for fortified food. It is important to design this platform to cater to the needs of the locals.

In a nutshell, a comprehensive approach that integrates infrastructure development, regulatory strengthening, technological adoption, stakeholder collaboration, and proactive economic and environmental strategies is essential to enhance the responsiveness of Sri Lanka's food fortification supply chain.

  

Comments