Tablets
and interactive whiteboards have become vital equipment in modern classrooms.
These technologies enable educators to produce dynamic and interactive
presentations that easily demonstrate complicated subjects (Chen, Looi and
Chen, 2009). Students can actively participate with the curriculum through
real-time notes and collaborative activities, resulting in deeper
comprehension. A teacher, for example, can utilize an interactive whiteboard in
a science lesson to demonstrate complex chemical reactions, offering students
with a visual and participatory learning experience that goes beyond
traditional approaches.
Platforms
such as Google Workspace and Microsoft Teams have transformed the way students
interact on projects and assignments. These tools enable real-time
collaboration, document sharing, and seamless communication while removing
geographical obstacles. Students can collaborate on assignments and projects
regardless of where they are in the world, fostering collaborative learning and
improving collaboration skills (Cole, Lennon and Weber, 2019). Students from
various regions can interact online to investigate and evaluate geographical
data in a virtual geography project, enhancing their understanding of the
topic.
The
flipped classroom concept is gaining popularity due to its ability to improve
learning outcomes (Rafool, Sullivan and Al-Bataineh, 2012). Students in this
approach access course content online prior to attending class. Video lectures,
readings, and other digital resources may be included in this subject. The
remainder of the class period is devoted to interactive discussions, problem
solving, and hands-on activities. As students apply theoretical knowledge to
real-world problems, the flipped classroom encourages active involvement and
greater understanding. In a flipped math class, for example, students may watch
instructional videos at home and then come to class prepared to answer
challenging arithmetic problems cooperatively.
Gamification,
which is the term used for the application of game design aspects to non-game
environments has proven to be an effective method for improving learning.
Educational games and quizzes, which are frequently given via digital
platforms, make learning more enjoyable and competitive (Su and Cheng, 2014).
Students are encouraged to get high marks and complete challenges, which leads
to better knowledge retention and a more positive attitude toward learning. A
history instructor, for example, may add a digital quiz game that allows pupils
to compete in answering historical questions, making the learning process more
exciting.
Blended
learning is the combination of traditional face-to-face training and online
resources. This adaptable method supports different learning styles and allows
students to benefit from both in-person engagement and technological advantages
(Chou and Chou, 2011). Educators may adjust lessons to students' specific
needs, ensuring that they have a personalized learning experience. In a
language class, for example, students may attend traditional sessions for
speaking practice while also using online language learning platforms for
additional exercises and vocabulary development.
Augmented
and Virtual Reality (AR/VR) technologies are transforming education by
delivering immersive learning experiences (Bastug et al., 2017). These
technologies enable students to interact with 3D simulations and explore
virtual settings, making abstract or complex subjects more apparent. In a
biology class, for example, students can utilize VR headsets to explore the
interior organs of the human body in 3D, improving their comprehension of
anatomy.
The
use of technology into the classroom has numerous advantages, including greater
student engagement, tailored learning experiences, and the development of
critical digital literacy skills. Successful instances of technological
integration can be seen in schools all across the world, as educators use
technology to create dynamic and engaging learning environments. These
educational practices constitute a paradigm change, adapting to the
requirements and preferences of 21st-century learners.
References:
Ahlquist, J. (2014). Trending now: Digital leadership education using social media and the social change model. Journal of Leadership Studies, 8(2), 57-60.
Ali, C.A. (2021). A
comparative study of SAM and ADDIE models in simulating STEM instruction. African
Educational Research Journal, 9(4), pp.852–859.
doi:https://doi.org/10.30918/aerj.94.21.125.
Bastug, E., Bennis, M.,
Medard, M. and Debbah, M. (2017). Toward Interconnected Virtual Reality: Opportunities,
Challenges, and Enablers. IEEE Communications Magazine, 55(6),
pp.110–117. doi:https://doi.org/10.1109/mcom.2017.1601089.
Carlson, M.D.A. and
Morrison, R.S. (2009). Study Design, Precision, and Validity in Observational
Studies. Journal of Palliative Medicine, 12(1), pp.77–82.
doi:https://doi.org/10.1089/jpm.2008.9690.
Chen, F.-H. ., Looi, C.-K.
. and Chen, W. (2009). Integrating technology in the classroom: a visual
conceptualization of teachers’ knowledge, goals and beliefs. Journal of
Computer Assisted Learning, 25(5), pp.470–488.
doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2009.00323.x.
Chou, A.Y. and Chou, D.C.
(2011). Course Management Systems and Blended Learning: An Innovative Learning
Approach. Decision Sciences Journal of Innovative Education, 9(3),
pp.463–484. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4609.2011.00325.x.
Classter.
(2019). School
Management. [online] Available
at: https://www.classter.com/school-management-system [Accessed 15 Sep. 2023].
Cole, A.W., Lennon, L. and
Weber, N.L. (2019). Student perceptions of online active learning practices and
online learning climate predict online course engagement. Interactive
Learning Environments, 29(5), pp.1–15.
doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2019.1619593.
Fuchs, C. (2010).
Cross-Institutional Blended Learning in Teacher Education. International
Journal of Mobile and Blended Learning, 2(2), pp.30–49.
doi:https://doi.org/10.4018/jmbl.2010040103.
Lee, J., Lim, C. and Kim,
H. (2016). Development of an instructional design model for flipped learning in
higher education. Educational Technology Research and Development,
[online] 65(2), pp.427–453. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-016-9502-1.
Rafool, B., Sullivan, E.
and Al-Bataineh, A. (2012). Integrating Technology into the Classroom. The
International Journal of Technology, Knowledge, and Society, 8(1),
pp.57–72. doi:https://doi.org/10.18848/1832-3669/cgp/v08i01/56265.
Rosenberg, M.J. and Foshay,
R. (2002). E-learning: Strategies for delivering knowledge in the digital
age. Performance Improvement, 41(5), pp.50–51.
doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/pfi.4140410512.
Simon, H.A. (2021). Bounded
Rationality and Organizational Learning. Organization Science,
2(1), pp.125–134.
Su, C-H. and Cheng, C-H.
(2014). A mobile gamification learning system for improving the learning
motivation and achievements. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning,
31(3), pp.268–286. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12088.
Team, L. (2022). 5 Reasons Digital
Literacy is Important for Students | Learning.com. [online] Learning.
Available at: https://www.learning.com/blog/reasons-digital-literacy-is-important-for-students/. [Accessed 15 Sep. 2023].
Comments
Post a Comment